Bayshore Boat City, Inc. v. Coconut Grove Marina, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bayshore Boat City, Inc. v. Coconut Grove Marina, Inc.

237 So. 2d 278, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1970

DocketNos. 69-732, 69-722

StatusPublished

This text of 237 So. 2d 278 (Bayshore Boat City, Inc. v. Coconut Grove Marina, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bayshore Boat City, Inc. v. Coconut Grove Marina, Inc., 237 So. 2d 278, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was the tenant of the ap-pellee. This appeal is from a final judgment entered after a non-jury trial can-celling the lease because of alleged violations of that agreement. The points presented argue that the evidence was insufficient because the violations were of unimportant provisions which would not support the harsh remedy or were violations which were waived by the acceptance of rent. A review of the record convinces us that appellant’s arguments are in every case based upon conflicting evidence and that the appellant has not shown either an absence of evidence to support the judgment or that the trial judge misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. E. g., Stephenson v. National Bank, 92 Fla. 347, 109 So. 424 (1926).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was the tenant of the ap-pellee. This appeal is from a final judgment entered after a non-jury trial can-celling the lease because of alleged violations of that agreement. The points presented argue that the evidence was insufficient because the violations were of unimportant provisions which would not support the harsh remedy or were violations which were waived by the acceptance of rent. A review of the record convinces us that appellant’s arguments are in every case based upon conflicting evidence and that the appellant has not shown either an absence of evidence to support the judgment or that the trial judge misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. E. g., Stephenson v. National Bank, 92 Fla. 347, 109 So. 424 (1926).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 So. 2d 278, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayshore-boat-city-inc-v-coconut-grove-marina-inc-fladistctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack