Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370

736 S.E.2d 173, 366 N.C. 370, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 53
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 25, 2013·No. 522A11·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court .are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010); Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370, 736 S.E.2d 173, 366 N.C. 370, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 53 (N.C. 2013).

736 S.E.2d 173 (Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Watkins
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
State v. Ducker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
State v. Bonetsky
784 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)