Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370
This text of 736 S.E.2d 173 (Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court .are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010); Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 S.E.2d 173, 366 N.C. 370, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baysden-v-state-366-nc-370-nc-2013.