Bayouth v. State
1928 OK CR 200, 267 P. 687, 40 Okla. Crim. 160, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 156
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 26, 1928·No. No. A-5927.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On a petition for rehearing it is earnestly urged that the punishment assessed is excessive and that justice requires that the judgment should be modified. We have again examined the record and are of the opinion that this contention is well founded.
The judgment (39 Okla. Cr. 8, 262 P. 702) is there *161 fore modified to the extent of striking out the imprisonment assessed. The petition for rehearing is overruled. Mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bayouth v. State, 1928 OK CR 200, 267 P. 687, 40 Okla. Crim. 160, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 156 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).
1928 OK CR 200 (Bayouth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sukovaty v. State
1951 OK CR 135 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1951)