Bayot (Alexander) v. Supreme Ct. of Nev.
This text of Bayot (Alexander) v. Supreme Ct. of Nev. (Bayot (Alexander) v. Supreme Ct. of Nev.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ALEXANDER BERNARD BAYOT, No. 75754 Petitioner, vs. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA; AND SANDY YOUNG, DEPUTY CLERK, Respondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION 7 urycLERK This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the respondent deputy clerk's decision to return unfiled a petition for rehearing of an order denying a motion to recall the remittitur in Bayot v. State, Docket No. 59410. Having reviewed the documents before this court, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 927, 931, 267 P.3d 777, 779-80 (2011) ("[T]he decision to entertain an extraordinary writ petition lies within our discretion."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
itifoug seilAtt Gibbons Hardesty
cc: Alexander Bernard Bayot Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(4)) 1947A eln
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bayot (Alexander) v. Supreme Ct. of Nev., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayot-alexander-v-supreme-ct-of-nev-nev-2018.