Bayork Realty Corp. v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bayork Realty Corp. v. Hunt

246 A.D. 544

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 544 (Bayork Realty Corp. v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bayork Realty Corp. v. Hunt, 246 A.D. 544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Suffolk county denying motion to strike out a portion of the amended answer of the Superintendent of Insurance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice may not be invoked to challenge the sufficiency of this defense. (Stern v. Philipsborn, 169 App. Div. 781.) Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 544.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Suffolk county denying motion to strike out a portion of the amended answer of the Superintendent of Insurance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice may not be invoked to challenge the sufficiency of this defense. (Stern v. Philipsborn, 169 App. Div. 781.) Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. [See ante, p. 544.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayork-realty-corp-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack