Bayonne v. Morris Cumings Dredging Co.
166 A. 174, 113 N.J. Eq. 116, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 996
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Fallon in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 119
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bayonne v. Morris Cumings Dredging Co., 166 A. 174, 113 N.J. Eq. 116, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 996 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 174 (Bayonne v. Morris Cumings Dredging Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trenton v. Howell
26 A.2d 505 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)