Bayne v. Bayne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bayne v. Bayne

259 A.D. 1041, 21 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1041 (Bayne v. Bayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bayne v. Bayne, 259 A.D. 1041, 21 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, made on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to modify the judgment of divorce and to provide for a reduction of alimony, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted to the extent of providing that the allowance to the respondent be reduced from $12,000 to $11,000 per year, and the allowance for the daughter of the parties be reduced from $6,000 to $5,000 per year, both payable in equal monthly installments. There has been a substantial reduction in the appellant’s income since the time of the award fixed by the decree of divorce. This circumstance, together with the rise in income taxes, requires a readjustment of the awards. Lazansky,- P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, made on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to modify the judgment of divorce and to provide for a reduction of alimony, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted to the extent of providing that the allowance to the respondent be reduced from $12,000 to $11,000 per year, and the allowance for the daughter of the parties be reduced from $6,000 to $5,000 per year, both payable in equal monthly installments. There has been a substantial reduction in the appellant’s income since the time of the award fixed by the decree of divorce. This circumstance, together with the rise in income taxes, requires a readjustment of the awards. Lazansky,- P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1041, 21 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayne-v-bayne-nyappdiv-1940.