Bayly v. Baxter

1 N.C. 128

This text of 1 N.C. 128 (Bayly v. Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayly v. Baxter, 1 N.C. 128 (circtnc 1793).

Opinion

Jones, J.

If rent be reserved, as £. 40 per annum, payable weekly, as the lessor will require, although the lessor [129]*129does not require it, he shall have debt for the rent at the year’s end. Likewise if a certain quantity of corn or hay be reserved. But it would in this case be a very great inconvenience; the warren may thereby be destroyed.

Doderidge, J.

If one grant estovers to be taken yearly, and none be taken for one year: they shall not be taken the next. In this case it would destroy the warren, if all were delivered at one time. He ought to shew a particular request, with certainty.

Whitlock, J. It is a rent here. Crew, C. J. concurred with Whitlock, J.

So the court was divided—ideo adjournatur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayly-v-baxter-circtnc-1793.