Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC v. Thomas Brandon Perthuis
This text of Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC v. Thomas Brandon Perthuis (Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC v. Thomas Brandon Perthuis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order issued October 4, 2022
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-19-00095-CV
BAYLOR MIRACA GENETICS LABORATORIES, LLC, Appellant
V.
THOMAS BRANDON PERTHUIS, Appellee
On Appeal from 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-16991
MEMORANDUM ORDER ON REMAND RELATED TO BRIEFING AND MEDIATION
On June 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Texas remanded this case to this
Court to consider the sufficiency of the evidence “under the proper legal
framework” and to address the remainder of the arguments made by appellant,
Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC. See Perthuis v. Baylor Miraca
Genetics Labs., LLC, 645 S.W.3d 228, 244 (Tex. 2022). BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The Court determines in light of the supreme court’s opinion that briefing
from the parties to address the issues on remand is appropriate. Accordingly, the
Court orders the parties to file additional briefing of no more than 5,000 words
each. The brief on remand of appellant is due 30 days from the date of this order.
The brief on remand of appellee is due 30 days from the date appellant’s brief on
remand is filed.
REFERRAL TO MEDIATION
The Court further determines that it is appropriate to refer this appeal for
resolution on remand by mediation.1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
§§ 154.021, 154.022(a), 154.023. Accordingly, the Court orders that this appeal be
referred to mediation unless any party to the appeal files an objection with the
Clerk of this Court within ten days after receiving this order. See id. § 154.022(b).
The parties shall choose a qualified mediator and agree on a reasonable fee
for the mediator’s services.2 See id. §§ 154.052, 154.054(a).
The Court sets the following deadlines:
• No later than 15 days from the date that this order is issued, the parties shall file with the Clerk of this Court a completed “Parties’ Notification to Court of Mediator.” This document can be
1 If the parties chose to mediate, the Court will entertain a motion to suspend the briefing schedule set out in this order until mediation is completed. 2 The Court does not recommend mediators. downloaded from the forms page of the Court’s website at http://www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.
• No later than 45 days from the date that this order is issued, the parties shall conduct the mediation.
• No later than two days from the conclusion of the mediation, the parties and the mediator shall advise the Clerk of this Court in writing whether the parties did or did not settle the underlying dispute.
All parties, or their representative with full settlement authority, shall attend
the mediation with their counsel. The mediator shall encourage and assist the
parties in reaching a settlement of their dispute but may not compel or coerce the
parties to enter into a settlement agreement. See id. § 154.053(a). All
communications relating to the mediation are confidential and not subject to
disclosure, except as set forth by law. See id. § 154.073. The Clerk of this Court,
however, will file this order, any objection to this order, and the completed
“Parties’ Notification to Court of Mediator” with the other documents filed in this
appeal that are available for public inspection.
Unless expressly authorized by the disclosing party, the mediator may not
disclose to either party information given in confidence by the other and shall at all
times maintain confidentiality with respect to communications relating to the
subject matter of the dispute. See id. § 154.053(b). Unless the parties agree
otherwise, all matters, including the conduct and demeanor of the parties and their counsel during the settlement process, are confidential and may never be disclosed
to anyone, including this Court. See id. § 154.053(c).
The Court will consider the agreed fee for the mediator’s services to be
reasonable and tax that fee as a cost of the appeal unless the parties agree to
another method of payment. See id. § 154.054.
___/s/ Richard Hightower_____ Justice Richard Hightower Acting Individually
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baylor Miraca Genetics Laboratories, LLC v. Thomas Brandon Perthuis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baylor-miraca-genetics-laboratories-llc-v-thomas-brandon-perthuis-texapp-2022.