Baylis Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Baylis Bros. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 386, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3526

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 14, 1969

DocketC.D. 3777

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 386 (Baylis Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baylis Bros. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 386, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3526 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Eichardson, Judge:

Defendant having moved for a dismissal of the protests in these cases on the ground of lack of prosecution and untimeliness upon the call of the calendar at San Juan, Puerto Eico, on February 18, 1969, and the court having granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for untimeliness, it is, therefore,

Oedeeed that the protests herein be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for untimeliness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eichardson, Judge:

Defendant having moved for a dismissal of the protests in these cases on the ground of lack of prosecution and untimeliness upon the call of the calendar at San Juan, Puerto Eico, on February 18, 1969, and the court having granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for untimeliness, it is, therefore,

Oedeeed that the protests herein be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for untimeliness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cust. Ct. 386, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baylis-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1969.