Bayley v. Taber

6 Mass. 451
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

It is our opinion that the direction of the judge m all the points was right.

When the defendants would avoid their promise by availing themselves of the statute, it is incumbent upon them to prove that the notes are within the statute; and the plaintiffs are [ * 453 ] not obliged to show that the notes are * without the statute. Neither are the plaintiffs bound to prove in what manner they acquired the property of notes payable to bearer, unless the defendants will first show that a former lawful holder of the notes lost them, or that they were unlawfully taken from him ; and then the plaintiffs would recover, if they could prove that they acquired them bona fide, and for a valuable consideration, in the usual course of negotiation, without notice of the manner in which the former holder lost his possession of them.

Let judgment be entered on the verdict

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayley v. Taber, 6 Mass. 451 (Mass. 1810).

6 Mass. 451 (Bayley v. Taber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Hannan
247 N.W. 536 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Shaw v. Waterhouse
8 A. 829 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1887)
Williams v. Cheney
69 Mass. 215 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1855)
Riggs v. Price
3 Greene 334 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1851)
McClintick v. Johnston
15 F. Cas. 1274 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1839)
Gillespie v. Hannahan
15 S.C.L. 503 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1828)
Stackpole v. Healy
16 Mass. 33 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1819)