Bayley v. Skirving

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Bayley v. Skirving

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 612

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedApril 24, 1773

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 612 (Bayley v. Skirving) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bayley v. Skirving, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 612 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1773).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing to me that the Defendant James Skirving is not in Contempt and. that the Time for his answering pursuant to the Rule obtained [613]*613for that Purpose is not expired, It is Ordered on Motion of Mr. Rutledge Sollicitor for the said Defendant, who lives above Twenty Miles from Charles Town, that the said Defendant be allowed a Fortnight’s Time from this Day, to plead, answer or demur to the Complainants Bill, and that a Commission do issue to take such Plea Answer or Demurrer.

Filed 24. April 1773.

Wm Burrows Master in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing to me that the Defendant James Skirving is not in Contempt and. that the Time for his answering pursuant to the Rule obtained [613]*613for that Purpose is not expired, It is Ordered on Motion of Mr. Rutledge Sollicitor for the said Defendant, who lives above Twenty Miles from Charles Town, that the said Defendant be allowed a Fortnight’s Time from this Day, to plead, answer or demur to the Complainants Bill, and that a Commission do issue to take such Plea Answer or Demurrer.

Filed 24. April 1773.

Wm Burrows Master in Chancery

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayley-v-skirving-ctchansc-1773.