Bayless v. State

265 S.W. 1113, 98 Tex. Crim. 245, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bayless v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Tex. Crim. 87 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 15, 1924·No. No. 8793.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County of the offense of robbery, and his punishment fixed at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. We have examined the indictment and find it to be in conformity with law as is also the charge of the court.

No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County of the offense of robbery, and his punishment fixed at twenty-five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. We have examined the indictment and find it to be in conformity with law as is also the charge of the court.

No error appearing, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Bayless v. State, 265 S.W. 1113, 98 Tex. Crim. 245, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 576 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

265 S.W. 1113 (Bayless v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.