Bayless v. Board of Education of the Clark County School District

Opinion

1 2 5 KERMIT S. BAYLESS 6 Case No. 2:22-cv-00335-JAD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 7 v. 8 Order BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK 9 COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., [Docket No. 13] 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss. Docket No. 13; see also Docket No. 10 (motion to dismiss). Plaintiff has not filed a response. Having evaluated the applicable standards, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. 14|| Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013); LR 7-2(d) (a party’s failure to respond to a motion 15] constitutes consent), the Court finds that a stay of discovery is proper in this case. Accordingly, 16]| the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. Docket No. 13. In the event resolution of the motion to dismiss does not result in the termination of this matter, the parties must submit a joint proposed 18]| discovery plan or joint status report within 14 days of the issuance of the order resolving the motion 19} to dismiss. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. . 21 Dated: August 24, 2022 LUN Bo. 22 Ne \ \ Nancy J.Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28