Bayless v. Baird

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 340
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bayless v. Baird. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 305
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1924·No. No. 18135·Published

Opinion

MATTHIAS, J.

1. The members of a building and loan association, whether borrowers or non-borrowers, have a mutual interest in its affairs; sharing alike its earnings, they must alike hear its losses.

2. A borrowing member of a building and laon association occupies a two-fold relation. As a debtor he must repay his1 loan with stipulated interest; as a stockholder he may participate in the earnings and must contributed to losses sustained.

[341]*3413. In an action by a receiver of an insolvent building and loan association to foreclose a mortgage on real estate given by a borrower who is á member and the ownwer of unma-tured running stock therein pledged as collateral security for said loan, said borrower is not entitled to have credited on his loan the dues theretofore paid on his unmatured running stock.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayless v. Baird, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 340 (Ohio 1924).

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 340 (Bayless v. Baird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.