Bayles v. Welsh

Ohio Supreme Court

Bayles v. Welsh

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 18, 1920·No. No. 16483·Published

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed; for the reason that the court of appeals upon hearing, found that its former decree was not induced or procured by means of fraud, and the only question presented by the record in this case involves a consideration of the weight of the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed; for the reason that the court of appeals upon hearing, found that its former decree was not induced or procured by means of fraud, and the only question presented by the record in this case involves a consideration of the weight of the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Bayles v. Welsh, 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 (Ohio 1920).

Pincite

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 521 (Bayles v. Welsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.