Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC d/b/a etc. v. State of Florida, Department of Health

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 2018
Docket17-3171
StatusPublished

This text of Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC d/b/a etc. v. State of Florida, Department of Health (Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC d/b/a etc. v. State of Florida, Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC d/b/a etc. v. State of Florida, Department of Health, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-3171 _____________________________

BAYFRONT HMA MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a BAYFRONT HEALTH - ST. PETERSBURG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, and GALENCARE, INC., d/b/a NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. John D.C. Newton, II, Administrative Law Judge.

October 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The recent convergence of this Court’s decision in State, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC, 236 So. 3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), and chapter 2018-66, Laws of Florida, has rendered the instant appeal moot and subject to dismissal. See Montgomery v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 468 So. 2d 1014, 1016-17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (explaining that “[a] case becomes moot, for purposes of appeal, where, by a change of circumstances prior to the appellate decision, an intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant a party any effectual relief,” and emphasizing that “[i]t is the function of a judicial tribunal to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not to give opinions on moot questions, or to declare principles or rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue”).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Geoffrey D. Smith, Timothy B. Elliott, and Corinne T. Porcher of Smith & Associates, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Stephen A. Ecenia, David M. Maloney, and Gabriel F. V. Warren of Rutledge Ecenia, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee Galencare, Inc., d/b/a Northside Hospital.

Jason Gonzalez and Amber Stoner of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Department of Health.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.
468 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
State of Florida, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC etc.
236 So. 3d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC d/b/a etc. v. State of Florida, Department of Health, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayfront-hma-medical-center-llc-dba-etc-v-state-of-florida-department-fladistctapp-2018.