Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC v. State

254 So. 3d 661

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 2018

DocketNo. 1D17-3171

StatusPublished

This text of 254 So. 3d 661 (Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bayfront HMA Med. Ctr., LLC v. State, 254 So. 3d 661 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The recent convergence of this Court's decision in State, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC , 236 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), and chapter 2018-66, Laws of Florida, has rendered the instant appeal moot and subject to dismissal. See Montgomery v. Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. , 468 So.2d 1014, 1016-17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (explaining that "[a] case becomes moot, for purposes of appeal, where, by a change of circumstances prior to the appellate decision, an intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant a party any effectual relief," and emphasizing that "[i]t is the function of a judicial tribunal to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not to give opinions on moot questions, or to declare principles or rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue").

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The recent convergence of this Court's decision in State, Department of Health v. Bayfront HMA Medical Center, LLC , 236 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018), and chapter 2018-66, Laws of Florida, has rendered the instant appeal moot and subject to dismissal. See Montgomery v. Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. , 468 So.2d 1014, 1016-17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (explaining that "[a] case becomes moot, for purposes of appeal, where, by a change of circumstances prior to the appellate decision, an intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant a party any effectual relief," and emphasizing that "[i]t is the function of a judicial tribunal to decide actual controversies by a judgment which can be carried into effect, and not to give opinions on moot questions, or to declare principles or rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue").

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 So. 3d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayfront-hma-med-ctr-llc-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack