Bayer v. Suntrup Buick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bayer v. Suntrup Buick

388 S.W.3d 180, 2012 WL 944449, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 373

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. No. ED 97134·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Bayer (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming, as corrected, the award of the Administrative Law Judge denying Claimant’s claim for permanent total disability benefits. We find that the facts found by the Commission support the award. Furthermore, the award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Bayer (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming, as corrected, the award of the Administrative Law Judge denying Claimant’s claim for permanent total disability benefits. We find that the facts found by the Commission support the award. Furthermore, the award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Bayer v. Suntrup Buick, 388 S.W.3d 180, 2012 WL 944449, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 180 (Bayer v. Suntrup Buick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.