Bayer v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 388
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedMay 11, 1981
DocketCC-80-327
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 388 (Bayer v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayer v. Department of Highways, 13 Ct. Cl. 388 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1981).

Opinion

WALLACE, JUDGE:

On August 19, 1980, at about 2:00 p.m., the claimant was operating his Oldsmobile automobile in a southerly direction on Kites Run Road in Wood County, West Virginia. Kites Run Road in this area is a one-lane gravel road, about 10 feet wide, maintained by the respondent. Near the road, to the west, is a creek that frequently overflows its banks. To the east of the road is an embankment that has slid partially into the road due to the washing action of the overflowing water from the creek. Additionally, the overflowing waters have created a ditch across Kites Run Road measuring 14 to 16 inches in depth.

[389]*389The claimant testified that he had frequently called respondent’s headquarters in Parkersburg to complain about the condition of the road, and was told, in effect, that the respondent was not going to do any more to the road. The Department of Highways had actual notice of the condition of the road, but the claimant, too, was fully aware of the condition, and in fact had proceeded through this area earlier in the day. Nevertheless, that afternoon, while traveling at a speed of 10 to 15 miles per hour, the claimant struck the ditch in the road and ruined two tires, incurring an expense of $131.01 for comparable replacements.

There is little doubt that the respondent was negligent in its maintenance of Kites Run Road, but the Court believes that the claimant, with his prior knowledge of the road’s condition, was likewise negligent. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, the Court allocates negligence as follows: claimant, 20%, respondent, 80%. Reducing the claimed damages by 20%, the Court makes an award in favor of the claimant in the amount of $104.81.

Award of $104.81.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Department of Highways
14 Ct. Cl. 8 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1981)
Hull v. Department of Highways
13 Ct. Cl. 408 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ct. Cl. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayer-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1981.