Bayer Schering Pharma Ag v. Lupin, Ltd.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bayer Schering Pharma Ag v. Lupin, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 676 F.3d 1316
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 30, 2011·No. 2011-1143·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG AND BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plozin,tiffs-Appellants, V. LUPIN, LTD AND LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG and BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaint£ffs-Appellants, V. SANDOZ, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1143, -1228

BAYER SCHERING PHARMA V- LU`PIN LTD 2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the S0uthern District of NeW York in case nos. 10-CV-5423 and 08-CV-3710, Judge Paul G. Gardephe. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. 0 R D E R ' The Pharrnaceutica1 Research and Manufacturers of America move for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in support of the plaintiffs-appe11ants. Upon consideration thereof IT ls OR:oERED THAT: The motion is granted __ FOR THE CoURT 3 mm /s/ Jan Ho1'bal§; CC‘ Date J an Horba1y C1erk Peter V. Bensinger, Jr., Esq. ¢_S_ c0UR¥:Hl;§,ppEAL5 pak R0be,,t F_ G,~e@n, ESq_ THE FEr)ERAL macon Joseph A. Hynds, Esq. JUN Mark T. Jansen, Esq. 3 0 2011 Christophe1' N. Sipes, Esq. mw H0RBAL¥ s2O CLEHi

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayer Schering Pharma Ag v. Lupin, Ltd., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Bayer Schering Pharma Ag v. Lupin, Ltd. (Bayer Schering Pharma Ag v. Lupin, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.