Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 851 F.3d 1302
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 17, 2014·No. 14-1032·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG AND BAYER S.A.S., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2014-1032 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00256-RMB-JS, Judge Renee Marie Bumb. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plain- tiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT J. KOCH, STEPHANIE R. AMOROSO, EDWARD J. MAYLE and RONALD L. SIGWORTH, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were BRADFORD J. BADKE and SONA DE, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were SUSANNAH LANDES WEAVER; and PETER A. BICKS, ALEX V. CHACHKES and ANDREW D. SILVERMAN, of New York, New York. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 17, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC (Bayer Cropscience Ag v. Dow Agrosciences LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.