Bayer Corp. v. Valverde

225 S.W.3d 207, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10415, 2005 WL 3439660
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2005·No. 08-05-00059-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion for reversal and remand for entry of judgment consistent with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties have settled all matters in controversy. By their motion, the parties have agreed that the underlying judgment should be reversed and the cause should be remanded for entry of a take-nothing judgment. Pursuant to tex.R.AppP. 42.1(a)(2)(B), we grant the agreed motion, reverse the trial court’s judgment, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of a take-nothing judgment. The motion does not specify that the parties have reached an agreement regarding costs. Accordingly, *208 costs are taxed against Appellant. See tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d).

CHEW, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayer Corp. v. Valverde, 225 S.W.3d 207, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10415, 2005 WL 3439660 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

225 S.W.3d 207 (Bayer Corp. v. Valverde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re MINORITY MEDIA TV-38 LLC
225 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)