Bayard v. Malcom

3 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 456
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 102 (Bayard v. Malcom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bayard v. Malcom, 3 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 456 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

Per curiam.

There can be no doubt of the mistake, nor, but that the whole is in good faith.

Though Mr. Towt appears the attorney on record, every one knows the connexion between him and Mr. Munro. He is to be supposed to act only under the direction of Mr. Munro.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 102, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bayard-v-malcom-nysupct-1805.