Bayard v. Malcolm

2 Johns. 101
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court ordered, that the rule entered at the last term, for arresting judgment, be vacated ; and that judg" ment be entered, as of that term for the defendants, for the insufficiency of the declaration; and further, that the attorney for the defendants make up., and file the record in due form, in twenty days, after service of a copy of this rule, or that the plaintiff make up the record, with a remittitur of the costs by the defendant.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bayard v. Malcolm, 2 Johns. 101 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

2 Johns. 101 (Bayard v. Malcolm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lusk v. Hastings
1 Hill & Den. 656 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)