Baya v. Revitz

281 So. 2d 521, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7701
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1973
DocketNo. 72-1042
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 281 So. 2d 521 (Baya v. Revitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baya v. Revitz, 281 So. 2d 521, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants’ point urges that a judgment for partition must be reversed because a cotenant may not seek partition where there is an outstanding lease giving the present right of possession. The trial judge correctly determined that the outstanding lease was not a bar. See Leonard v. Browne, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 872.

Appellee contends that a stipulation in the record of this case was a stipulation of settlement and that therefore the appellants cannot appeal the consent judgment. We agree. Our examination of the record convinces us that the stipulation was a settlement.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baya v. Revitz
345 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 So. 2d 521, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baya-v-revitz-fladistctapp-1973.