Baya v. Hodges
This text of 352 So. 2d 135 (Baya v. Hodges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant, who is a lawyer, complains of a Judgment against him for over $25,000.00 on account of his misrepresentation and double-dealing of a client, the Appellee. It appears Appellant received money from his client to which Appellant was not entitled and upon a properly pleaded and proved case the jury awarded damages to the client. Unfortunately, the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations and the court erred in letting the case go to the jury.
We most reluctantly reverse the Judgment.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 So. 2d 135, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baya-v-hodges-fladistctapp-1977.