Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.

Ninth Circuit

Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.

220 F. 295, 136 C.C.A. 277, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1915

DocketNo. 2447

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 F. 295 (Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co., 220 F. 295, 136 C.C.A. 277, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461 (9th Cir. 1915).

Pincite

Opinions

GILBERT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce. In that respect the facts in the case are identical with those which were before this court in the recent case of Nordgard v. Marysville & Northern Railway Company, 218 Fed. 737, 134 C. C. A. 415, and we need not add to the discussion that was there had.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GILBERT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We may assume from the evidence that the defendant in error was a common carrier; but it is clear that it was not engaged in interstate commerce. In that respect the facts in the case are identical with those which were before this court in the recent case of Nordgard v. Marysville & Northern Railway Company, 218 Fed. 737, 134 C. C. A. 415, and we need not add to the discussion that was there had.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 F. 295, 136 C.C.A. 277, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bay-v-merrill-ring-logging-co-ca9-1915.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack