Bay v. Bay's Windows & Siding

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bay v. Bay's Windows & Siding

387 S.W.3d 411, 2012 WL 6139540, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. ED 98348·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming by supplemental opinion the award and decision of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming by supplemental opinion the award and decision of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bay v. Bay's Windows & Siding, 387 S.W.3d 411, 2012 WL 6139540, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1566 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 411 (Bay v. Bay's Windows & Siding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.