Bay Steel Erections v. Chung

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bay Steel Erections v. Chung

483 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17341

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 13, 1985

DocketNo. BG-15

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 27 (Bay Steel Erections v. Chung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bay Steel Erections v. Chung, 483 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17341 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

This is an appeal of a workers compensation order entered on remand pursuant to this court’s opinion in Bay Steel Erections v. Chung, 458 So.2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The record¹ indicates appellee substantially complied with this court’s order “that claimant be required to complete and file wage loss benefit forms for the months which these forms were not filed,” therefore we affirm the determination that benefits are due. Appellee concedes an error in the method of computation of benefits due, therefore the award is reversed and the case is remanded for recomputation of benefits according to the statutory method provided in Section 440.15(3)(b), Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOANOS, Judge.

This is an appeal of a workers compensation order entered on remand pursuant to this court’s opinion in Bay Steel Erections v. Chung, 458 So.2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The record¹ indicates appellee substantially complied with this court’s order “that claimant be required to complete and file wage loss benefit forms for the months which these forms were not filed,” therefore we affirm the determination that benefits are due. Appellee concedes an error in the method of computation of benefits due, therefore the award is reversed and the case is remanded for recomputation of benefits according to the statutory method provided in Section 440.15(3)(b), Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 27, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2743, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bay-steel-erections-v-chung-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack