Bay Ridge Toyota, Inc. v. Lyons

272 A.D.2d 397, 707 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5105
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 397 (Bay Ridge Toyota, Inc. v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bay Ridge Toyota, Inc. v. Lyons, 272 A.D.2d 397, 707 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award dated December 8, 1998, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated June 9, 1999, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the arbitrator’s refusal to grant it an adjournment to conduct an independent examination of the subject car warranted vacatur of the award. One of the bases for the award, that the vehicle was out of service due to repairs or malfunction for 15 or more days, was not contingent upon whether the car was presently operable (see, General Business Law § 198-b [c]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Francis v. Atlantic Infiniti, Ltd.
64 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Spitzer
860 N.E.2d 705 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Spitzer
26 A.D.3d 88 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Kucher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
9 Misc. 3d 45 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
General Motors Corp. v. Warner
5 Misc. 3d 968 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Spitzer
6 Misc. 3d 228 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
Kucher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
194 Misc. 2d 688 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 397, 707 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bay-ridge-toyota-inc-v-lyons-nyappdiv-2000.