Bay Park Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Triple M. Roofing, Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bay Park Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Triple M. Roofing, Corp.

55 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2011 WL 904273

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 2011

Docket3D09-3004

StatusPublished

This text of 55 So. 3d 592 (Bay Park Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Triple M. Roofing, Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bay Park Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Triple M. Roofing, Corp., 55 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2011 WL 904273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Upon consideration of the responses to this Court’s December 22, 2010, order to show cause, including the response filed by former counsel, Berk, Merchant & Sims, PLC, and finding all of the responses to be insufficient, the Court awards, as a sanction, a reasonable attorney fee to Appellant for the prosecution of the appeal, to be assessed against both Triple M. Roofing Corporation and IRT-Arcon, Inc., to be paid in equal amounts by each party and their counsel, pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2009) (stating an award of reasonable attorney fees is to be paid to the prevailing party “in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing party’s attorney”). The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Upon consideration of the responses to this Court’s December 22, 2010, order to show cause, including the response filed by former counsel, Berk, Merchant & Sims, PLC, and finding all of the responses to be insufficient, the Court awards, as a sanction, a reasonable attorney fee to Appellant for the prosecution of the appeal, to be assessed against both Triple M. Roofing Corporation and IRT-Arcon, Inc., to be paid in equal amounts by each party and their counsel, pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2009) (stating an award of reasonable attorney fees is to be paid to the prevailing party “in equal amounts by the losing party and the losing party’s attorney”). The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 So. 3d 592, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3483, 2011 WL 904273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bay-park-towers-condominium-association-inc-v-triple-m-roofing-corp-fladistctapp-2011.