Bay City Brewing Co. v. McDonell

Michigan Supreme Court

Bay City Brewing Co. v. McDonell

64 N.W. 12, 106 Mich. 172, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 971

DecidedJuly 2, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.W. 12 (Bay City Brewing Co. v. McDonell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bay City Brewing Co. v. McDonell, 64 N.W. 12, 106 Mich. 172, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 971 (Mich. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

The principal defendant, Robert Donnelly, kept a saloon for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the township of Deep River, Arenac county, in 1893. His -tax was, of course, due May 1st, without the payment of which he was engaged in an illegal business. Mr. McDonell, the county treasurer, testified that it was customary in that county to permit saloon keepers to pay the tax in installments; that he himself had kept a saloon, and paid in that manner. It thus appears that the officers of that county permitted saloon keepers, including Donnelly, to carry on that business contrary to the express provisions of the law. Donnelly made four payments, aggregating $200; the last one being made August 30th. They were received into the treasury as liquor taxes, and before the garnishee summons was served [173]*173the treasurer had paid out this money according to the provisions of the law. Meanwhile Donnelly became indebted to the plaintiff, who sued Mm, and garnished the county treasurer.

It is claimed by the plaintiff that these payments in installments were illegal, and that, therefore, the treasurer did not hold the money so paid in his official capacity. The plaintiff has no greater right to this money than has Donnelly. Donnelly cannot sue to recover it. He paid it voluntarily into the treasury. He did not. deposit it with the treasurer or his deputy, to be kept until the full sum was paid. Being voluntary, and having been deposited in accordance with the understanding of Donnelly, both he and his creditors are bound by such voluntary payment. Curry v. Township of Tawas, 81 Mich. 355.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

The principal defendant, Robert Donnelly, kept a saloon for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the township of Deep River, Arenac county, in 1893. His -tax was, of course, due May 1st, without the payment of which he was engaged in an illegal business. Mr. McDonell, the county treasurer, testified that it was customary in that county to permit saloon keepers to pay the tax in installments; that he himself had kept a saloon, and paid in that manner. It thus appears that the officers of that county permitted saloon keepers, including Donnelly, to carry on that business contrary to the express provisions of the law. Donnelly made four payments, aggregating $200; the last one being made August 30th. They were received into the treasury as liquor taxes, and before the garnishee summons was served [173]*173the treasurer had paid out this money according to the provisions of the law. Meanwhile Donnelly became indebted to the plaintiff, who sued Mm, and garnished the county treasurer.

It is claimed by the plaintiff that these payments in installments were illegal, and that, therefore, the treasurer did not hold the money so paid in his official capacity. The plaintiff has no greater right to this money than has Donnelly. Donnelly cannot sue to recover it. He paid it voluntarily into the treasury. He did not. deposit it with the treasurer or his deputy, to be kept until the full sum was paid. Being voluntary, and having been deposited in accordance with the understanding of Donnelly, both he and his creditors are bound by such voluntary payment. Curry v. Township of Tawas, 81 Mich. 355.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.W. 12, 106 Mich. 172, 1895 Mich. LEXIS 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bay-city-brewing-co-v-mcdonell-mich-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack