Baxter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baxter v. State

73 So. 3d 333, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17202, 2011 WL 5109534

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 28, 2011

Docket5D10-4193

StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 3d 333 (Baxter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baxter v. State, 73 So. 3d 333, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17202, 2011 WL 5109534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORFINGER, C.J.

Thaddeus Baxter appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Mr. Baxter pled guilty to the charge of sale or delivery of a controlled substance in 1985. At the time of his plea, neither Mr. Baxter’s attorney nor the judge advised Mr. Baxter of the deportation consequences of entering the plea. Now, more than twenty-five years later, Mr. Baxter, citing Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), contends that his plea was involuntary because his attorney failed to inform him about the deportation consequences of his guilty plea.

Mr. Baxter’s motion is untimely. A motion for postconviction relief based on the failure to advise a defendant regarding possible deportation consequences of a guilty plea is held to the same two-year time constraints as other postconvietion motions. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208, 218 (Fla.2006). Further, this Court has held that Padilla does not apply retroactively. See Santiago v. State, 65 So.3d 575, 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539, 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

For these reasons, we affirm the denial of Mr. Baxter’s motion for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO and EVANDER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORFINGER, C.J.

Thaddeus Baxter appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

Mr. Baxter pled guilty to the charge of sale or delivery of a controlled substance in 1985. At the time of his plea, neither Mr. Baxter’s attorney nor the judge advised Mr. Baxter of the deportation consequences of entering the plea. Now, more than twenty-five years later, Mr. Baxter, citing Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), contends that his plea was involuntary because his attorney failed to inform him about the deportation consequences of his guilty plea.

Mr. Baxter’s motion is untimely. A motion for postconviction relief based on the failure to advise a defendant regarding possible deportation consequences of a guilty plea is held to the same two-year time constraints as other postconvietion motions. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208, 218 (Fla.2006). Further, this Court has held that Padilla does not apply retroactively. See Santiago v. State, 65 So.3d 575, 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); State v. Shaikh, 65 So.3d 539, 540 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

For these reasons, we affirm the denial of Mr. Baxter’s motion for postconviction relief.

AFFIRMED.

MONACO and EVANDER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 So. 3d 333, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17202, 2011 WL 5109534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack