Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Baxter v. State

Baxter v. State

589 So. 2d 471, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12083, 1991 WL 254236
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baxter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 586 So. 2d 1196 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1991·No. No. 91-913·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Baxter’s conviction and sentence for robbery. However, we remand for correction of the judgment to properly reflect the offense for which Baxter was charged and convicted.

The information charged Baxter with second degree robbery: section 812.13(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1989). He pled nolo to robbery with a weapon, a first degree felony: section 812.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). The judgment correctly adjudicated him guilty of second degree robbery, but it failed to specify the subsection. We remand for correction of the judgment so as to avoid any future confusion or misunderstanding.

Affirm; Remand.

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baxter v. State, 589 So. 2d 471, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12083, 1991 WL 254236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

589 So. 2d 471 (Baxter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.