Baxter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baxter v. State

375 So. 2d 16, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15354

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1979

DocketNo. 77-1972

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 375 So. 2d 16 (Baxter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baxter v. State, 375 So. 2d 16, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant Dennis Lee Baxter appeals the judgment and sentence entered against him for possession and sale of hydromorphone in violation of Section 893.13, Florida Statutes. He argues that the trial court erred in sending a tape recorder and recording of a telephone conversation between himself and a witness into the jury room during deliberations. The tape recording had previously been admitted into evidence and played for the jury in open court. During deliberations, the jury returned to the court to ask to have the tape recording replayed. Defense counsel’s objection was overruled and the recording was sent to the jury room. We cannot agree with appellant’s argument that this action constituted reversible error and, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence imposed against him.

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.400(d) permits all things received into evidence, other than depositions, to be taken into the jury room during deliberations. As appellee pointed out, the committee notes to this rule in Florida Statutes Annotated reveal that the committee recommended altering the prior Section 919.04(3), Florida Statutes (1965), to exclude written or recorded statements or confessions from that evidence which would be allowed in the jury room during deliberations. However, the notes clearly point out that this proposal was not approved. Therefore, the prior rule was transferred unchanged and remains in effect today.

GRIMES, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant Dennis Lee Baxter appeals the judgment and sentence entered against him for possession and sale of hydromorphone in violation of Section 893.13, Florida Statutes. He argues that the trial court erred in sending a tape recorder and recording of a telephone conversation between himself and a witness into the jury room during deliberations. The tape recording had previously been admitted into evidence and played for the jury in open court. During deliberations, the jury returned to the court to ask to have the tape recording replayed. Defense counsel’s objection was overruled and the recording was sent to the jury room. We cannot agree with appellant’s argument that this action constituted reversible error and, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence imposed against him.

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.400(d) permits all things received into evidence, other than depositions, to be taken into the jury room during deliberations. As appellee pointed out, the committee notes to this rule in Florida Statutes Annotated reveal that the committee recommended altering the prior Section 919.04(3), Florida Statutes (1965), to exclude written or recorded statements or confessions from that evidence which would be allowed in the jury room during deliberations. However, the notes clearly point out that this proposal was not approved. Therefore, the prior rule was transferred unchanged and remains in effect today.

GRIMES, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 So. 2d 16, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack