Baxter v. Rice

38 Mass. 197
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1839
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Mass. 197 (Baxter v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baxter v. Rice, 38 Mass. 197 (Mass. 1839).

Opinion

Shaw C. J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. The sheriff justifies in trespass de bonis asportatis, under an attachment on mesne process made by his deputy, and a return thereon, and the objection is, that the return contains no sufficient description of the goods. It is highly important, upon grounds of public policy, that a good degree of exactness and particularity should be observed, in returns on mesne process, to show their identity, and thereby more definitely to fix the rights and responsibilities of all parties, in relation to them. But, from the nature of the subject, it is difficult to lay down a precise general rule.

In the present case, we have not thought it necessary to express any opinion upon the sufficiency of the return, because there appear to be ample materials for amending it; and upon the facts shown by the officer’s affidavit, we think it a fit case for an application to the Court of Common Pleas, who have the custody of the record, for leave to amend the return ; and the cause will be continued for that purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mass. 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-rice-mass-1839.