Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

202 N.W. 829, 160 Minn. 535, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 592

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 15, 1925

DocketNo. 23,935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 N.W. 829 (Baxter v. Orinoco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baxter v. Orinoco Co., 202 N.W. 829, 160 Minn. 535, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 592 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein was dismissed, upon the ground that appellant failed to comply with chapter 22, Laws 1917, requiring a deposit of $15 with the clerk.

This is a motion asking that the appeal be reinstated. We see no reason for so doing. It appears that appellant’s counsel requested appellant to attend to such matter in sufficient time. Appellant failed to comply with the request until it was too late. Appellant is alone at' fault in the matter. The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein was dismissed, upon the ground that appellant failed to comply with chapter 22, Laws 1917, requiring a deposit of $15 with the clerk.

This is a motion asking that the appeal be reinstated. We see no reason for so doing. It appears that appellant’s counsel requested appellant to attend to such matter in sufficient time. Appellant failed to comply with the request until it was too late. Appellant is alone at' fault in the matter. The motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.W. 829, 160 Minn. 535, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-orinoco-co-minn-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack