Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Baxter v. Orinoco Co.

197 N.W. 219, 158 Minn. 530, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 913

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 15, 1924

DocketNo. 23,935

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 197 N.W. 219 (Baxter v. Orinoco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baxter v. Orinoco Co., 197 N.W. 219, 158 Minn. 530, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 913 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order fixing and allowing a receiver’s compensation for services and expenses in a corporation. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not perfected within the time limited by statute.

It appears that the statutory notice of the filing of the court’s order fixing and allowing the receiver’s compensation was served on September 14, 1923. The notice of appeal was served and filed on October 3, 1923, together with the bond on appeal, but the statutory fee of $15 was not deposited in the clerk’s office until October 27, 13 days after the time for appealing had expired. Under the statute the appeal fee must be deposited within the statutory time for taking the appeal. This not having been done, the appeal did not become effective. Laws 1917, p. 80, chapter 66. Wheeler v. Crane, 141 Minn. 78, 169 N. W. 476, 597. Respondent is entitled to have the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order fixing and allowing a receiver’s compensation for services and expenses in a corporation. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that it was not perfected within the time limited by statute.

It appears that the statutory notice of the filing of the court’s order fixing and allowing the receiver’s compensation was served on September 14, 1923. The notice of appeal was served and filed on October 3, 1923, together with the bond on appeal, but the statutory fee of $15 was not deposited in the clerk’s office until October 27, 13 days after the time for appealing had expired. Under the statute the appeal fee must be deposited within the statutory time for taking the appeal. This not having been done, the appeal did not become effective. Laws 1917, p. 80, chapter 66. Wheeler v. Crane, 141 Minn. 78, 169 N. W. 476, 597. Respondent is entitled to have the appeal dismissed. It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 N.W. 219, 158 Minn. 530, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-orinoco-co-minn-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack