Baxter v. Nix

1936 OK 243, 56 P.2d 352, 176 Okla. 589, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 269
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 17, 1936·No. No. 26833.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment was rendered on the 23rd day of October, 1933, upon the pleadings and opening statement of counsel. On June 27, 1935, there was an order overruling the motion for new trial. Under many opinions of this court such orders serve no purpose to extend the time past the six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment in which to perfect an appeal. Miller v. A. & B. Furniture Co., 173 Okla. 319, 48 P. (2d) 1032; Small v. Rice, 82 Okla. 158, 198 P. 998; Forrest E. Gilmore Co. v. James, 156 Okla. 216, 10 P. (2d) 392; Adams v. Daniels, 176 Okla. 142, 54 P. (2d) 607; Pound v. Campbell, 174 Okla. 331, 49 P. (2d) 1088.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

MeNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and BUSBY, PHELPS, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. RILEY, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baxter v. Nix, 1936 OK 243, 56 P.2d 352, 176 Okla. 589, 1936 Okla. LEXIS 269 (Okla. 1936).

1936 OK 243 (Baxter v. Nix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oklahoma Preferred Finance & Loan Corp. v. Morrow
1972 OK 36 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1972)
Montgomery v. Swarts
1951 OK 222 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
DeBose v. Barker
1951 OK 176 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
Keas v. Keas
1950 OK 192 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)