Baxter v. Letts

592 So. 2d 1089, 1992 WL 18575
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 1992
Docket78294
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 1089 (Baxter v. Letts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baxter v. Letts, 592 So. 2d 1089, 1992 WL 18575 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

592 So.2d 1089 (1992)

Joseph BAXTER, Petitioner,
v.
Gavin K. LETTS, Etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 78294.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 6, 1992.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, Chief, Appellate Div., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Melynda L. Melear, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Joseph Baxter, seeks relief by either a writ of mandamus or habeas *1090 corpus. We treat the petition as a petition for habeas corpus and have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(9), of the Florida Constitution. Baxter seeks relief from the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in State v. Baxter, 581 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), in which the district court reversed his downward-departure sentence in an appeal by the State. The district court's decision resulted in an increase of three years' incarceration for Baxter. Baxter seeks habeas corpus relief on the grounds that he was not represented in the State's appeal to the Fourth District, that he was indigent, that he was incarcerated, and that he was without actual notice of the State's appeal. The notice of appeal was sent to Baxter's trial counsel, who did not represent him in the appeal.

Baxter has a constitutional right to counsel in the State's appeal to the district court. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Hooks v. State, 253 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1044, 92 S.Ct. 1330, 31 L.Ed.2d 587 (1972); McDaniel v. State, 219 So.2d 421 (Fla. 1969). Accordingly, we vacate the district court's decision, and direct that the district court proceed anew with the State's appeal once Baxter is properly represented by counsel.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doyle v. Fogan
629 So. 2d 1091 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Anderson v. State
632 So. 2d 1016 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Brown
599 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Manning
595 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 1089, 1992 WL 18575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxter-v-letts-fla-1992.