Baxter v. Baxter

250 A.D. 502, 295 N.Y.S. 40, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8386
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issue in this case was not the legitimacy of the child, but the liability of defendant for his support. The evidence taken, but not considered, by the court was relevant and material to that issue, and it was error to determine the issue upon presumptions of law alone.

[503]*503The orders should be reversed and the proceeding reopened and remitted to the Domestic Relations Court to determine upon the evidence whether the defendant is liable for the support of the infant William Baxter.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Orders unanimously reversed, without costs, and the proceeding reopened and remitted to the Domestic Relations Court to determine upon the evidence whether defendant is liable for the support of the infant William Baxter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baxter v. Baxter, 250 A.D. 502, 295 N.Y.S. 40, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 502 (Baxter v. Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Houston
199 Misc. 469 (New York Family Court, 1950)
Anonymous v. Anonymous
174 Misc. 906 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)