Baxt v. Liloia
663 A.2d 1353, 142 N.J. 445
This text of 663 A.2d 1353 (Baxt v. Liloia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baxt v. Liloia, 663 A.2d 1353, 142 N.J. 445 (N.J. 1995).
Opinion
Certification is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider the claim of petitioners that the settlement of the underlying litigation expressly excluded plaintiffs’ claims against the attorney defendants, contrary to the suggestion contained in the Appellate Division’s opinion.
Jurisdiction is not retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
663 A.2d 1353, 142 N.J. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxt-v-liloia-nj-1995.