Baxley v. State
This text of 554 So. 2d 1231 (Baxley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Waylon Baxley’s appeal contains only one issue which merits discussion. The record reflects that the trial court assessed costs against appellant pursuant to sections 943.25 and 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985) without giving Baxley notice or the opportunity to be heard. That was reversible error. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to the state to' seek reassessment of the costs after proper notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 So. 2d 1231, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 43, 1990 WL 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baxley-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.