Baxley v. Baxley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Baxley v. Baxley

51 S.E. 591, 123 Ga. 686, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 577

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baxley v. Baxley. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ga. 60 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 3, 1905·Published

Opinion

Candler, J.

The plaintiff in error not having insisted on any of the grounds of his motion for a new trial except those which complain that the court erred in charging on the subject of notice in tbe plaintiff of the defendants’ deed, and it appearing that the charges complained of stated sound principles of law and were warranted by the evidence, the judgment overruling the motion will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candler, J.

The plaintiff in error not having insisted on any of the grounds of his motion for a new trial except those which complain that the court erred in charging on the subject of notice in tbe plaintiff of the defendants’ deed, and it appearing that the charges complained of stated sound principles of law and were warranted by the evidence, the judgment overruling the motion will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur, except Simmons, O. J., absent.

Baxley v. Baxley, 51 S.E. 591, 123 Ga. 686, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 577 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

51 S.E. 591 (Baxley v. Baxley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.