Bax v. Union Electric Company

297 S.W.3d 661, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672, 2009 WL 4279235
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. ED 93082·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In their lawsuit filed against Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren UE (Am-eren), plaintiffs Dennis Bax and Rhonda Bax (Landowners) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ameren and against Landowners. The trial court found that the transmission line easement agreement did not permit recovery of damages for the diminution in value of Landowners’ farm and home caused by construction of a high voltage transmission line on their property. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bax v. Union Electric Company, 297 S.W.3d 661, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1672, 2009 WL 4279235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 661 (Bax v. Union Electric Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.