Bawden v. Townes

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 6, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-08034·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x : JANE DOE, : Plaintiff, : 19-CV-8034 (ALC) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : DAVID K. TOWNES, : : Defendant. : --------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The portion of the preliminary injunction (ECF 11) that enjoined Defendant from “[r]evealing Plaintiff’s name to the media or any third party, other than Defendant’s attorney” has since be removed. (ECF 63). Earlier, I denied Plaintiff’s motion to continue proceedings anonymously. (ECF 44). Accordingly, by October 9, 2020, Plaintiff shall amend the case caption to reflect her name. By October 13, 2020, Plaintiff shall move by letter motion to keep any ECF entries, which are currently not publicly available, under seal. Any motion shall address Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman LLP, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016). Otherwise, all documents will be publicly available. Plaintiff is directed to email and mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Defendant and file proof of service within seven days of this Order. SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: October 6, 2020 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bawden v. Townes, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Bawden v. Townes (Bawden v. Townes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)