Bauza v. State

417 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20434
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1982·No. No. 81-559·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s motion for rehearing, our earlier opinion is vacated and the following decision is substituted in its stead:

Due to apparent misunderstandings by the parties and the trial court concerning the plea bargain arrangement, we REVERSE the judgment and sentence and REMAND with directions to allow the appellant to withdraw his nolo contendere plea on Count II and the State to reinstate Count I and proceed on both counts.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bauza v. State, 417 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

417 So. 2d 275 (Bauza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc.
417 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)