Bauza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bauza v. State

417 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20434

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1982

DocketNo. 81-559

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 275 (Bauza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bauza v. State, 417 So. 2d 275, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s motion for rehearing, our earlier opinion is vacated and the following decision is substituted in its stead:

Due to apparent misunderstandings by the parties and the trial court concerning the plea bargain arrangement, we REVERSE the judgment and sentence and REMAND with directions to allow the appellant to withdraw his nolo contendere plea on Count II and the State to reinstate Count I and proceed on both counts.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI