Bautista, Valdemar
This text of Bautista, Valdemar (Bautista, Valdemar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PD-1657-14 PD-1657-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/19/2014 7:26:58 AM Accepted 12/29/2014 9:23:41 AM TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
No.____________
_________________________________
VALDEMAR BAUTISTA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
_________________________________________________________
On Petition for Discretionary Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District, Houston, Texas in Cause No. 14-13-00457-CR, Affirming an appeal from a judgment issued in Cause No. 11-05-13821- CR from the 506th District Court of Waller County, Texas.
R. Scott Shearer December 29, 2014 TBA No. 00786464 929 Preston, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77002 (713) 254-5629 (713) 224-2889 FAX ShearerLegal@Yahoo.com
Attorney for Appellant
December 19, 2014 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS:
NOW COMES, VALDEMAR BAUTISTA, and files this Motion To Extend
Time To File Petition For Discretionary Review. In support of this motion, he would
respectfully show the Court the following:
I.
In a PUBLISHED opinion delivered November 20, 2014, a panel of the Fourteenth
Court of Appeals AFFIRMED Appellant’s appeal from a judgment of conviction for
continuous sexual abuse of a child by the 506th District Court of Waller County. Appellant
did not file a motion for rehearing. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due on
December 19, 2014. This motion to extend time to file petition for discretionary review is
timely filed within thirty days after the court of appeals issued its opinion or overruled
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing or within fifteen days of said deadline. See TEX. R. APP.
PROC. 68.2.
II.
Appellant is requesting additional time to file the petition for discretionary review.
More time is necessary to research the issues involved.
III.
Appellant asserts that this motion is not made solely for purposes of delay and that
the granting of this motion will not prejudice the rights of the State. IV.
Appellant is therefore requesting a thirty [30] day extension so that his Petition may
be timely filed.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that the
Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals will grant his Motion To Extend Time To File
Petition For Discretionary Review.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/R. SCOTT SHEARER R. Scott Shearer TBA No. 00786464 929 Preston, Suite 200 Houston, TX 77002 (713) 254-5629 (713) 224-2889 FAX ShearerLegal@Yahoo.com
December 19, 2014 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Motion has been served upon the State of Texas by e- mailing a copy of same to the following parties at the following addresses on this the 19th day of December, 2014:
LAURIE SELLERS. A.D.A. WALLER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 645 12TH STREET HEMPSTEAD, TX 77445
/s/R. SCOTT SHEARER R. Scott Shearer
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bautista, Valdemar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bautista-valdemar-texapp-2014.