Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC.
753 N.W.2d 173, 482 Mich. 896
This text of 753 N.W.2d 173 (Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC., 753 N.W.2d 173, 482 Mich. 896 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Edwin E. BAUTISTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, and
AAA Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES, INC., and Sears, Roebuck & Company/Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
753 N.W.2d 173, 482 Mich. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bautista-v-miresco-promotional-sales-inc-mich-2008.