Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC.
753 N.W.2d 173, 482 Mich. 896
Opinion
Edwin E. BAUTISTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, and
AAA Michigan, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES, INC., and Sears, Roebuck & Company/Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC., 753 N.W.2d 173, 482 Mich. 896 (Mich. 2008).
753 N.W.2d 173 (Bautista v. MIRESCO PROMOTIONAL SALES INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.